Coverage built for California firms — where Rule of Professional Conduct 1.4.2 requires written disclosure to clients if you have no malpractice insurance, and law corporations and LLPs must carry it. We structure lawyers professional liability and the rest of the program.
California does not require every lawyer to carry malpractice insurance — but it does something most states don’t: it requires you to tell clients in writing when you don’t have it. On top of that, certain firm structures must carry coverage as a condition of operating. The result is that for most California practices, going without insurance is either prohibited or something you have to disclose to every substantial client. Here is how that works.
Under California Rule of Professional Conduct 1.4.2 (the successor to former rule 3-410, effective November 1, 2018), a lawyer who knows or reasonably should know that they do not have professional liability insurance must inform the client in writing, at the time of engagement, that the lawyer has no insurance. If the lawyer loses coverage during a representation, written notice is required within 30 days.
The rule has limited exceptions — among them matters reasonably expected to take four hours or less, government lawyers and in-house counsel acting in that capacity, and emergencies. For most ordinary client engagements, though, the practical choice is to carry insurance or hand every substantial client a written notice that you do not. The State Bar of California sets the conduct and reporting rules attorneys operate under.
Beyond the disclosure rule, California requires malpractice coverage outright for certain firm structures:
For a California firm, lawyers professional liability is effectively the price of practicing without a disclosure obligation — and, for law corporations and LLPs, a requirement of the structure itself. We place LPL at limits that fit your matters and entity type, structure the claims-made retroactive date and tail correctly, and add the cyber, business owner’s policy, EPLI, and workers’ compensation coverage California firms need. We also make sure your coverage status is clean before the engagement-letter stage so Rule 1.4.2 is a non-issue.
Tell us about your operation and your loss history — we’ll confirm we can write California and structure the limits to match.